论文部分内容阅读
早些年我们习惯使用“音乐语言”这个术语,大家都认同这个字,对它所指的涵意也没有人怀疑过,但是近几年来,有人开始不赞成这个术语了,并且好像附合者也越来越多了,不赞成使用这个术语的人,理由好像也很充分,比如说什么音乐具有多义性啊,特别是音乐并不具有严格、明确的语义性,在语言中人就是人,狗就是狗,在音乐中语言就做不到这一点,这些意见不仅可以作为一家之言,甚至可以说它是言之成理的,但反过来再想一想,这个术语本来就从其它学科借用来的,因此,它具有一种比喻性的特点,如果说,任何比喻
In earlier years we were accustomed to the term “musical language”. Everyone agrees with this word and nobody doubts what it means. However, in recent years, some people have started to disagree with this term and seem to attach Also more and more, do not agree with the use of the term people, the reason seems to be very full, for example, what is the meaning of music with ambiguity, especially music does not have a strict and clear semantic, in the language of people is human , Dogs are dogs and can not do this in the language of music. These ideas can not only be used as a saying, but they can even be justified, but in turn, the term has been borrowed from other disciplines Therefore, it has a metaphorical character, if any, metaphor