论文部分内容阅读
中國古代的官制變化,大致由簡趨繁,又由繁趨簡,而遼與宋神宗元豐改制前的官制,同屬最爲繁雜的階段。遼朝官制雖繁,但史料尚不及宋朝百分之一,元朝史官在並不清楚遼朝官制的前提下,胡亂編纂《遼史·百官志》,結果是真假混雜,似是而非,難以分辨,令治史者撲朔迷離,如墮五里霧中。今人研究遼官制,因史料稀缺,不能不帶有猜想的成分。本文也祇能作爲一種猜想,愚者千慮,或有一得。由於史料的局限,今人難以了解從契丹族原有的北、南宰相制演變爲北、南官宰相制的過程,而轉變完成之後,南面官的宰相與原契丹舊制的南宰相又混
The changes of the official system in ancient China generally ranged from simple to complex and from simple to simple, while both the Liao and Songzong Zongfeng’s pre-reform official system belonged to the most complicated stage. Although the official system of the Liao Dynasty was numerous, the historical data were still less than 1% of that of the Song Dynasty. The historian of the Yuan Dynasty randomly compiled “Liao Shih-Bai Guan Zhi” without knowing the official system of the Liao Dynasty. The result was mixed truth and falsity, specious and difficult to distinguish , So that history is complicated and confusing, such as falling in the fog. Today, the study of Liao official system, due to the scarcity of historical data, can not but with ingredients of conjecture. This article can only be used as a guess, fool anxious, or have a gain. Due to the limitations of historical materials, it is hard for people today to understand the process of transforming the original northern and southern slaughter systems of the Khitan ethnic group into those of the northern and southern kings, and after the completion of the transition, the prime minister of the south official was re-blended with the former prime minister’s south slaughterhouse