论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨不同信息框架下军校学员特质焦虑及人格特征对风险决策的影响。方法采用自编的风险决策问卷、艾森克人格问卷(EPQ)和状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI),对某军校403名学员进行团体心理测评,分析不同信息框架下风险决策的差异。结果 1正性信息框架下32.18%的被试倾向于保守,67.82%的被试倾向于冒险;负性信息框架下20.63%的被试倾向于保守,79.37%的被试倾向于冒险,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。男性在负性信息框架下80.71%的被试倾向冒险,而在正性信息框架下仅有67.55%的被试倾向冒险,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);女性两组之间决策差异没有统计学意义(P>0.05)。2正性信息框架下,高神经质的被试24.19%倾向于保守方案,75.81%倾向于冒险;低神经质的被试有46.00%倾向于保守,54.00%的被试倾向于冒险,两组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。负性信息框架下,两组间比较,决策差异没有统计学意义(P>0.05);无论正性还是负性信息框架,内外向人格的风险决策差异均没有统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论负面框架下军校学员个体更倾向于冒险决策,正性信息框架下高神经质人群倾向于冒险决策。
Objective To explore the impact of trait anxiety and personality traits of cadets on risk decision-making under different information frames. Methods A self-made risk decision questionnaire, EPQ and STAI were used to conduct a group psychology assessment of 403 cadets in a military academy to analyze the differences in risk decision-making under different information frames. Results1.32.18% of the subjects in the positive information frame tended to be conservative, 67.82% of the subjects tended to take the risk, 20.63% of the subjects tended to be conservative in the negative information frame, 79.37% of the subjects tended to take risks, and two groups The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). While 80.71% of the subjects in the negative information frame tended to take risks while only 67.55% of the subjects in the positive information frame tended to take risks. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05) No significant difference between decision-making (P> 0.05). Under the positive information frame, 24.19% of highly neurotic subjects tended to be conservative, 75.81% tended to take risks; 46.00% of those with low neuroticism tended to be conservative while 54.00% of subjects tended to take risks. Comparing the two groups The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in decision-making between the two groups under the negative information frame (P> 0.05). There was no significant difference in risk decision between internal and external personality, no matter positive or negative information frame (P> 0.05). Conclusion Under the negative framework, individual cadets tend to make risk-taking decisions. In the positive information frame, high-neurotic people tend to make risk-taking decisions.