论文部分内容阅读
9父亲注意到,在7月14日——24日中国科学院召开的批判反社会主义的科学纲领(即章伯钧罗隆基以民盟中央名义制定的《对于有关我国科学体制问题的几点意见》)座谈会上,与父亲私交极深的院长兼会议主席郭沫若开口一个章(伯钧)罗(隆基),闭口一个章罗地批判着。而翦伯赞的通篇发言,一个右派的名字也没点。在发言结尾处,竟这样讲:“我们这些高级知识分子,包括我在内,在大鸣大放期间都说了一点,走了点火,虽然大小程度各有不同,是不是都算右派呢?不是的。我的动机目的是要搞好研究工作,对党提些意见,虽然过分一些,偏激一些,不要紧,只要动机是好的,不是想搞垮党,搞垮社会主义,相反的是想搞得更好,那么言者无罪,而且今后还可以讲……”到了9月18日,在由郭沫若主持的社会科学界
9 My father noticed that on July 14-24, the Chinese Academy of Sciences criticized the anti-socialist scientific program (that is, Zhang Bojun Luo Longji made “some opinions on issues concerning the scientific system of our country” made by the Central Committee of the NLD) At the symposium, Guo Moruo, the dean and chairman of the meeting with a deep personal friendship with his father, opened a chapter (Bo Jun) Luo (Long Ji) and closed a chapter of criticism. And, as Bozan speaks throughout, there is no point in the name of a right. At the end of the speech, I should say the following: “Those high-ranking intellectuals including myself, including myself, have said a little during the big talk and they have ignited the fire. Although they are all different in size, are they all right? No, my motive is to do a good job in research and to raise some opinions on the party. Although it is excessive and extreme, it does not matter if motivation is good and it is not to want to overthrow the party and overthrow socialism. On the contrary, Want to make better, then the speaker innocence, and in the future can say ... ... ”to September 18, chaired by Guo Moruo social science community