论文部分内容阅读
《价格理论与实践》1991年第1期《企业法人变更,谁来承担价格违法行为的责任》一文,提出了一个很有实践意义的问题,并以某省物价检查所查处某有色金属材料公司的价格违法案件为例,具体剖析了问题,这种文风是值得学习的。但根据此文所介绍的价格违法案件的具体情节,某省物价检查所对企业法人变更后,前后法人各所应承担的责任的结论,尚需进一步探讨。因为此案经国家物价局物价监督检查司复议,并维持原结论,所以此文有很强的导向作用和借鉴价值,故提出商榷,以就教于物价检查战线的同行。
“Price Theory and Practice” in 1991 No. 1 “corporate jury change, who will bear the responsibility for price violations,” a text, put forward a very practical significance of the problem and a provincial price inspection found a non-ferrous metal materials company The price of illegal cases, for example, the specific analysis of the problem, this style of writing is worth learning. However, according to the specific circumstances of the price infringement cases described in this article, the conclusion of the responsibility of the legal persons before and after the change of enterprise legal person in a province’s price inspection still needs to be further explored. Because the case was reviewed by the Price Supervision and Inspection Department of the State Price Bureau and the original conclusion was maintained, this article has a strong guiding role and draws lessons from the value. Therefore, it is open to discussion so as to teach colleagues in the price inspection front.