论文部分内容阅读
2012年修订的《刑事诉讼法》增加了“违法所得没收程序”这一特别程序。设立这一程序的目的在于打击贪污腐败、恐怖活动等重大犯罪活动,确切地讲,主要用于收缴死亡或逃匿的被告人、犯罪嫌疑人的违法所得。但由于条文的模糊以及程序运行时嫌疑人、被告人未到案,学术界和实务界对此存在着一些争议,违法所得没收程序运行中需要证明的对象即是其中之一。文章从证据基本理论出发,明确了认定证明对象的标准,以及对案件结果有决定影响的未知或待证事实。在此基础上,确定了违法所得没收程序的三个证明对象。
The revised Criminal Procedure Law of 2012 added the special procedure “Forfeiture of Unlawful Proceeds”. The purpose of establishing this procedure is to crack down on major criminal activities such as corruption and terrorist activities. Specifically, this procedure is mainly used for confiscating the illegal proceeds of defendants and criminal suspects who died or escaped. However, due to the obscure provisions and suspects and defendants in the operation of the program, the academic and practical circles have some controversies about this. One of the objects to be proved in the operation of the forfeiture of illegal proceeds is one of them. Based on the basic theory of evidence, the article clarifies the criteria for determining the object of proof and the unknown or pending facts that have a decisive influence on the outcome of the case. On this basis, the three proof objects of the forfeiture of illegal proceeds were determined.