论文部分内容阅读
1932年清华大学入学考试的方式变革引起了争议,这一事件本身需要进行史实的重建。中学国文教育是双方的共同关注点,考试中的“对对子”的确为出题者陈寅恪所侧重,期借此防止国语不国和传统不传,并希望以大学入学考试的创新来促动中学国文教育的改变;但反击的“社会”舆论却强调国立大学入学考试的方式应与中学国文教育的现状保持一致,并不断诉诸“国家”的权威。正是“社会”对“国家”的监督以及对“国家机关”职责的强调,迫使后者做出了让步;而“社会”对“国家”的监督又并非以对立的姿态出现,反而是在代“国家”立言,要求后者维护“中国教育行政的统一”。
The change of the way the Tsinghua University entrance examination was conducted in 1932 caused controversy, and the incident itself required the reconstruction of historical facts. Chinese education in middle schools is a common concern of both parties. In exams, “right and wrong son” is really focused on Chen Yinque, so as to prevent the non-traditional Chinese from being discredited and to pass on the innovation of the college entrance examination But the counterattack of “social” public opinion emphasizes that the way of entrance examination of the National University should be consistent with the current situation of Chinese education in secondary schools and continue to resort to the authority of “state”. It is precisely the “social” supervision of “state” and the emphasis on the responsibility of “state organs,” forcing the latter to make concessions; and the supervision of “society” on “state” Instead of showing opposition to each other, it is instead making a righteous move on behalf of the “state” and demanding that the latter maintain “the unification of China’s education administration.”