论文部分内容阅读
传统的新自由主义主导的国际投资法范式,以促进投资自由化和保护外国投资者的利益为主要目标,而相对忽视东道国的国内监管权。近年来,伴随着国际资本流动的多元化和“全球治理”理念的兴起,加之传统国际投资理论固有的不合理性,新自由主义逐渐被各国所抛弃,一种新的被称为“嵌入式自由主义”的国际投资法范式正在成为主流。这种范式的国际投资法更为追求促进投资自由化、保护投资者利益与保障东道国国内监管权的平衡,更加注重东道国在国家安全、金融稳定、环境保护、劳工保障等重要公共政策领域所保有的适当监管空间。中国应把握这一潮流并结合自身在国际投资中的身份转变,就相关投资政策及对外投资条约实践做出相应的必要调整,在保护投资者利益与保障国内监管权中寻求适当平衡。
The traditional neo-liberal-dominated international investment law paradigm has the main objective of promoting investment liberalization and protecting the interests of foreign investors while relatively ignoring the host country’s domestic regulatory power. In recent years, along with the diversification of international capital flows and the rise of the concept of “global governance”, coupled with the inherent irrationality of traditional international investment theory, neo-liberalism has gradually been abandoned by all countries. A new type of “ The paradigm of international investment law of ”embedded liberalism" is becoming mainstream. This paradigm of international investment law seeks to further promote investment liberalization, protect the interests of investors and safeguard the balance of domestic regulatory power in host countries, and pay more attention to the host country’s possession of such important public policy areas as national security, financial stability, environmental protection and labor protection Proper regulatory space. China should grasp this trend and combine its own identity changes in international investment to make corresponding necessary adjustments on the relevant investment policies and the practice of treaty on overseas investment, and seek an appropriate balance between protecting the interests of investors and safeguarding domestic regulatory powers.