论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨子宫内膜炎综合治疗的临床疗效,积累临床诊疗经验。方法:将2003年1月-2012年12月本院收治确诊的子宫内膜炎患者随机抽取180例分成两组,对照组90例采用传统单纯抗炎治疗,观察组90例在对照组基础上加用人工周期联合治疗,2~3个疗程后对比分析两组治疗效果。结果:疗程结束后,对照组痊愈31例,好转33例,无效26例,总有效率为71.11%;观察组90例患者均出现好转,85例痊愈,5例好转,痊愈率达94.44%,总有效率100%。观察组临床疗效优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:采用抗炎+人工周期联合治疗子宫内膜炎疗效显著,优于传统单纯抗炎治疗,值得临床进行推广应用。
Objective: To explore the clinical curative effect of endometritis comprehensive treatment and accumulate clinical experience. Methods: From January 2003 to December 2012, 180 cases of endometritis diagnosed in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups. The control group of 90 patients were treated with simple anti-inflammatory therapy. The observation group of 90 patients were divided into two groups based on the control group Combined with artificial cycle combined treatment, 2 to 3 courses of comparative analysis of two groups after treatment. Results: In the control group, 31 cases were cured, 33 cases improved, 26 cases ineffective and the total effective rate was 71.11%. In the observation group, 90 cases improved, 85 cases recovered, 5 cases improved, the cure rate reached 94.44% The total efficiency of 100%. The clinical efficacy of observation group was better than that of control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: The combination of anti-inflammatory + artificial cycle of endometritis treatment was significantly better than the traditional anti-inflammatory treatment alone, it is worth promoting the clinical application.