“民主评议政风行风工作”是当前我国政府绩效评估的主要形式,行评就是“第三方评估”的主要形式。自2006年以来,“行评”成为全国性和制度性的工作。现在参与“行评”的“第三方”构成趋于多元化、科学化“;第三方”评议对象和内容更加广泛;“第三方”评议的形式更为多样。当前“第三方评估”中存在的主要问题有:第一,评议主体与被评对象信息不对称;第二,有的被评单位过分看重评议结果的排名;第三,一定程度上存在公众被动参与以及形式参与的问题;第四,个别地方存在评议成本过高的问题。对此我们建议:第一,增加被评政府部门直接服务对象的参评比例,减少广义的服务对象的比例;对于有行政执法权的部门进行评议,需要改变评议的内容,不能对它们进行“满意度”评议;第二,在有条件的地方,将评议重点转向分清部门责任、落实责任人、理顺管理体制、提高办事效率,重点解决一些深层次的问题;第三,提高评议问卷(调查表)的专业质量水准,在有条件的地方推行网上评议的方法;第四,“行风评议”也要讲成本,用提高评议科学性的方法提高评议有效性。 “Democratically evaluate the style of work” is the current government performance evaluation of China’s main form of performance evaluation is “third-party evaluation ” the main form. Since 2006, “Comment” has become a national and institutional work. The “third party” who now participates in “comment” “tends to be more diversified and scientifically ”; the third party “has more extensive appraisal objects and contents; and the form of” third party “comment is more diverse. At present, the main problems existing in the ”third party evaluation“ are as follows: firstly, information asymmetry between the subject of assessment and the object being evaluated; secondly, some units under assessment place too much emphasis on the ranking of the assessment results; and third, to some extent, The passive participation of the public, and the formal participation of the public. Fourth, there are problems of over-evaluation in some places. In this regard, we suggest: First, to increase the proportion of direct service targets to be assessed government departments to reduce the proportion of clients in general terms; for departments with administrative law enforcement authority to review, you need to change the content of the review, not to them ” Satisfaction “; secondly, wherever possible, the review will be shifted to clarifying departmental responsibilities, implementing responsible persons, rationalizing the management system, improving efficiency and focusing on solving some deep-seated problems. Third, (Questionnaire) professional quality standards, the implementation of online assessment methods where possible; Fourth, ”style reviews " should also talk about costs, with a scientific evaluation method to improve the effectiveness of the review.