论文部分内容阅读
刑法修辞学借助于语言这一媒介增强自身的解释力,并通过说服、论辩而取得客观性与主体间性。修辞的运用可以使刑法学家在建构理论之时,能够在法官、刑法学家和受众之间找到一个大致可以接受的理论方案,使刑法学家说着晦涩的行话、法官自行其是、民众茫然应对的尴尬局面得以自行消解,从而使刑法理论的解释力、司法判断的可接受性、民众对刑法规范的自愿认同成为了一种可能。当然。现代刑法学还应重视修辞学在立法语言选择与刑法解释中的具体运用,即不仅重视刑法立法语言的明确性,避免含糊不清的语言表述,而且还需要把可接受性作为判定刑法解释是否达到目的。从而是否合法的终极性标准。
Criminal law rhetoric enhances its own explanatory power by means of language, and obtains objectivity and intersubjectivity through persuasion and argument. The application of rhetoric can make the criminal law scholars construct a generally acceptable theoretical scheme between the judge, the criminal law scientist and the audience at the time of constructing the theory so that the criminal law scientist speaks obscure jargon and judges judge themselves, The embarrassing situation can be solved by itself, so that the explanatory power of criminal law theory, the acceptability of judicial judgment, the public’s voluntary approval of the criminal law has become a possibility. of course. Modern criminal jurisprudence should also pay attention to the specific application of rhetoric in the choice of legislative language and interpretation of criminal law, that is, not only the clarity of the legislative language of criminal law should be emphasized, the vague language expression should be avoided, but also the acceptability should be regarded as Achieve their goals. So whether the law of the ultimate standard.