论文部分内容阅读
被绑架后又在绑架者的逼迫下杀害第三人的行为是在丧失人身自由和意志自由的情况下所为的行为。被绑架者既是事实上的受害者也是形式上的施害者,其是否应该受到刑事上的责任追究或者因此而减少责任,需要我们用专业的知识进行分析后才能得出结论。文章运用刑法理论上的被胁迫的行为、紧急避险和期待可能性理论分别对宜宾首富被胁迫杀人案进行浅显的解析,在这个过程中对被胁迫者的责任给出自己的看法。
The act of killing a third person after being kidnapped and persecuted by the kidnappers is an act done in the event of loss of liberty and freedom of the person. Being abducted is both a de facto victim and a formal victim, whether or not the kidnap victim should be held criminally accountable or, as a result, diminished responsibility, requires our expert knowledge to be analyzed before we reach a conclusion. In this paper, we use the theories of coercion of criminal law theory, the theory of emergency hedging and the possibility of expectation to make a brief analysis of the threatened murderers in Yibin’s richest people respectively. In the process, we give our own views on the responsibility of the coerced individuals.