对比米非司酮与曼月乐用于围绝经期功能失调性子宫出血治疗的疗效

来源 :中国医药指南 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:wolovenorton
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的 探究围绝经期功能失调性子宫出血患者采用米非司酮和曼月乐治疗的临床效果对比。方法 于2018年2月至2019年2月这一期间,随机选取本院收治的102例围绝经期功能失调性子宫出血患者,按照数字表法分为两组,对比组患者采用米非司酮治疗,试验组患者采用曼月乐治疗,并对两组患者治疗有效率、月经量、子宫内膜厚度、血红蛋白水平以及并发症发生率进行对比。结果 试验组患者治疗有效率94.12%(48/51),高于对比组患者的80.39%(41/51),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组患者月经量(37.35±4“,”Objective To investigate the clinical effects of mifepristone and Mirena in perimenopausal dysfunctional uterine bleeding patients.Methods During the period from February 2018 to February 2019, 102 patients with perimenopausal dysfunctional uterine hemorrhage were randomly selected and divided into 2 groups according to the digital table method. The patients in the comparative group were treated with mifepristone. The experimental group used Mirena treatment. The treatment efficiency, menstruation, endometrium thickness,hemoglobin level and complication rate were compared between the two groups. Results The effective rate of the experimental group was 94.12% (48/51), which was higher than 80.39% (41/51) in the control group (P<0.05); The menstrual volume (37.35±4.25) ml and endometrial thickness (4.25±0.15) mm in the experimental group were significantly smaller than those (56.63±6.43) ml and (7.16±1.42) mm in the control group (P<0.05); The hemoglobin level in the experimental group (122.75±11.35) g/L was higher than that in the control group (98.63±1.75) g/L, and the difference was also statistically significant (P<0.05); The incidence of complications in the experimental group was 1.96% (1/51), which was lower than 15.68% (8/51) in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with mifepristone,Mirena is effective in the treatment of perimenopausal dysfunctional uterine bleeding. It can effectively improve the endometrial thickness and hemoglobin level, reduce the amount of menstruation and complications. It is safe and effective. It is actually an ideal clinical treatment, which is worthy of further popularization and application.
其他文献
目的 对功能性消化不良患者实施心理护理联合健康教育的效果进行观察。方法 选取84例功能性消化不良患者,病例选取时间为2018年9月至2019年9月,根据随机数字表法将患者分别对照组与观察组,每组42例,在对两组患者护理中,将常规护理用于对照组患者护理中,将心理护理联合健康教育用于观察组患者护理中,护理后对两组护理前后心理状态变化、用药依从性及生存质量指标评分进行比较。结果 护理后,观察组SAS评分为(46.17±1.06)分、SDS评分为(43.35±2.37)分,均低于对照组的(53.87±3.62)分