评判农药利弊要客观科学

来源 :农药市场信息 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:zjt518
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
在8月10日出版的《中国科学报》第三版醒目位置有一则标题为“农民一年往地里打多少遍农药”的文章颇引人注意,《报刊文摘》也予以了转载。文章不长,但仔细阅读之后,相信稍有农药常识之人都很容易发现该文的漏洞百出。文章过于武断的观点与立场不仅有违“科学”二字,也极易对广大读者产生误导,是对农药以及农药行业从业人员的中伤。笔者以为,在如今大部分农药已为低毒、安全、环保的背景下,我们对农药的认知不应还仅停留在二十世纪九十年代,甚至更久远的七八十年代。《中国科学 In the prominent position of the third edition of the “China Science Newspaper” published on August 10, there was an article titled “How Many Farmers Play Pesticides in a Year” and the “Newspaper Digest” was also reprinted . The article is not long, but after reading it carefully, I believe people with slight knowledge of pesticides can easily find the loopholes in the article. The article is too arbitrary point of view and position not only contrary to the “science”, but also easily mislead the majority of readers, is a pesticide and practitioners in the pesticide industry. In my opinion, most pesticides are now in the context of low toxicity, safety and environmental protection. Our understanding of pesticides should not only remain in the 1970s and 1980s even in the 1990s. "Chinese science
其他文献
贝多芬说:我情愿写10000个音符,也不愿写一个字母。  而我,情愿用10000个字,去换贝多芬的一个音符。但我知道,他根本不稀罕。  有什么办法?在伟大的艺术与它谦卑的粉丝之间,就存在着这种不平等。  但我依旧虔诚地朝拜着,并且相信:每写下10000个字,就与音乐圣殿的距离又近了一个音符……  它好玩,如同漫画里的对话框,人未到,声音先入画,未见人,声音先迎客,平淡生活因之增添了小小的趣味;