论文部分内容阅读
美国比较文学学者厄尔.迈纳的著作《比较诗学》自译介以来一直在国内广受好评,然而我们不能忽略其局限性。在本文中,笔者试图从文学自主性这个角度谈论《比较诗学》研究方法的不足。由于迈纳将其研究限定在文学自主这个前提之上,这使其结论出现了一定的局限性。本文论证,比较诗学的进一步发展需要我们突破文学自主性,将跨学科和文化的视野纳入到比较诗学的研究中来。
American comparative literature scholar Earl Miner’s book Comparative Poetics has been widely acclaimed in the country since its translation and introduction, yet we can not ignore its limitations. In this article, I attempt to discuss the shortcomings of “comparative poetics” research methods from the perspective of literary autonomy. As Miner limited his research to the premise of literary autonomy, which led to its conclusions have some limitations. This article argues that the further development of comparative poetics requires that we break through the literary autonomy and bring the interdisciplinary and cultural horizons into the study of comparative poetics.