论文部分内容阅读
李某雇请兰某为商场工人。2006年4月23日,兰某在上班时突然死亡。由于兰某生前患有先天性心脏病,李某遂认为兰某之死就是该病所引起。在真正的死亡原因不明的情况下,李某未向有关部门报告,也未经法医进行尸检,即让人将尸体存放在殡仪馆。兰某的亲属赶到时,对死因提出疑问。而此时已因尸体存放时间过了太久,相关部门亦无法确定死因。对兰某亲属的赔偿要求,李某辩称兰某系死于先天性心脏病,不属工伤也不属为雇佣事务发生的死亡,不应当赔偿。李某究竟应否赔偿?——魏蔚
Lee hired Lan for the mall workers. April 23, 2006, Lan sudden death at work. As a result of congenital heart disease Lan Moumou, Lee then Lanmou death is caused by the disease. In the case of the true cause of death is unknown, Lee did not report to the authorities, but also without a forensic autopsy, that is, people put the body stored in a funeral parlor. Lan's relatives arrived, questioned the cause of death. At this moment, the corpse has been stored for too long and the relevant department can not determine the cause of death. Lee relatives of the compensation claims, Lee argued that Lankan Department died of congenital heart disease, is not a work-related injury is not a hiring business, should not be compensated. Whether Lee should compensate? - Wei Wei