论文部分内容阅读
我国《刑法》中“但书”规定能否适用于司法实践个案存在争议,由此形成了关于“但书”规定性质的分歧,即“入罪限制标准说”和“出罪标准说”两种不同的观点。“但书”规定的司法实践适用与刑法的解释一脉相承,在刑法的解释尚不完善的背景之下,否定“但书”规定在司法实践中的适用,必然会损害一部分人的利益以维护狭隘的刑法体系的自洽性。但是直接根据“但书”规定进行出罪确实会导致犯罪构成体系的弱化,不利于依法治国的构建,因此需要在承认“但书”规定得以适用于司法实践的前提之下为其在教义学体系之内找到恰当的位置,以寻求两种争议的和解。
There is controversy over the applicability of the “Provisions” in China’s “Criminal Law” to the judicial practice cases, resulting in the disagreement on the nature of the “ ”Convicted of the standard that “ two different views. The application of judicial practice stipulated in the ”“ book and the criminal law interpretation have the same strain. Under the background that the interpretation of the criminal law is still not perfect, the negation of the application of the ”“ provisions in judicial practice will inevitably damage some people Interests to maintain a narrow criminal law system of self-consistency. However, to directly convict a crime according to the stipulation of ”“ ’s book will indeed lead to the weakening of the criminal constitution system and to the construction of governing the country according to law. Therefore, under the premise of admitting that the ” It finds its place within the doctrinal system in search of reconciliation between the two controversies.