论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较异位妊娠腹腔镜保守手术治疗与化学药物保守治疗的临床治疗效果。方法:选取2014年1月到2015年1月于我院就诊的异位妊娠患者共76例,将患者随机分为观察组与对照组,每组各38例。对照组患者给予药物保守治疗,观察组患者给予腹腔镜保守手术治疗,观察并比较两组患者的治疗效果。结果:观察组38例患者在接受腹腔镜保守手术治疗之后,观察组患者治疗总治疗效果明显优于对照组患者。观察组患者平均住院时间和再次异位妊娠率明显低于对照组,P<0.05,有统计学意义。结论:临床上在治疗异位妊娠患者时,与化学药物保守治疗相比,采用腹腔镜保守手术治疗方法具有较好的治疗效果和临床应用价值。
Objective: To compare the conservative treatment of laparoscopic ectopic pregnancy with conservative treatment of chemical drugs in clinical treatment. Methods: A total of 76 patients with ectopic pregnancy treated in our hospital from January 2014 to January 2015 were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group with 38 cases in each group. Patients in the control group were treated conservatively. Patients in the observation group were given laparoscopic conservative surgery. The therapeutic effect was observed and compared between the two groups. Results: In the observation group of 38 patients undergoing laparoscopic conservative surgery, the observation group of patients treated with total treatment was significantly better than the control group of patients. The average length of stay and the rate of ectopic pregnancy in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion: In the treatment of ectopic pregnancy patients, compared with the conservative treatment of chemical drugs, the use of laparoscopic conservative surgery has good therapeutic effect and clinical value.