论文部分内容阅读
一、引言《專利法》第22條第3款中對於發明或實用新型具備創造性的要求中“突出的實質性特點”和“實質性特點”的判斷,是主觀性很强的判斷標準。即使在專利審查指南中“發明有突出的實質性特點,是指對所屬技術领域的技術人員来説,發明相對於現有技術是非@而易見的”的詮釋下,非@而易見性的判斷對於以本领域技術人員的虚擬身份進行創造性審查的審查員来講,仍帶有明@的主觀性。如何使主觀性的判斷標準客觀化,以便於針對同一發明,不同的判斷個體都能够以本领域技
I. INTRODUCTION Judgment in paragraph 3 of Article 22 of the Patent Law concerning the inventive step of inventive step or utility model is “subjective in nature” and “substantive feature” Judgment criteria. Even in the guidelines for patent examination, “the obvious substantive features of inventions mean that the invention is non-obvious and obvious to the prior art” to those skilled in the art Judgment of sexuality is still subjective to the examiner who creatively examines the virtual identity of a person skilled in the art. How to objectify subjective judgmental standards so as to facilitate that for the same invention, different judgments may be made by individuals in the art