论文部分内容阅读
世贸组织争端解决机制(DSM)是富有成效的,作为弱势一方的发展中成员在此机制下能够寻求到比较公正的裁决,即DSM能做到形式上的正义。但是,由于DSM本身缺乏实施能力,即使发展中国家的申诉要求得到了世贸组织正式裁决的支持,也难以在裁决的执行上取得应得的实质性收益,也就是说,DSM难以实现实质正义。文章系统地分析了DSM执行机制的实质不正义之处以及实现DSM执行机制的实质正义的途径——在世贸组织争端解决机制中嵌入赔偿救济;并阐述赔偿救济的具体制度。
The WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism (DSM) has been fruitful. As a developing member of the disadvantaged party, this mechanism can find a more just ruling that DSM can achieve formal justice. However, due to the lack of implementation capability of DSM itself, it is difficult for DSOs to obtain substantive benefits due to the implementation of the ruling even if the claims of developing countries are supported by formal WTO rulings. In other words, it is difficult for DSM to achieve substantive justice. The article systematically analyzes the DSM implementation mechanism of the real injustice and DSM implementation mechanism of the substantive justice approach - WTO dispute settlement mechanism embedded in the compensation relief; and expounds the specific system of relief.