论文部分内容阅读
对2010—2012年《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》发表的1069篇论文进行质量后评价。发现仍存在摘要的研究目的部分不简练、研究方法部分不清晰、结果和结论部分不具体的问题。统计结果表明:表述不佳的论文摘要有149篇,占摘要总数的13.9%;总体满足Ei的要求,但还有提高质量的空间。
Post-quality evaluation of 1069 papers published in Journal of Tsinghua University (Natural Science Edition) 2010-2012 was conducted. Found that there is still a summary of the research purpose part is not concise, the research method is not clear, the results and conclusions are not specific part of the problem. The statistical results show that there are 149 dissertations with poorly represented abstracts, accounting for 13.9% of the total number of abstracts; the overall requirements of Ei are satisfied, but there is still room for improvement in quality.