外国仲裁裁决的承认与执行是国际商事仲裁中最重要的问题之一。自《承认与执行外国仲裁裁决公约》(《纽约公约》)于1987年在中国生效以来,中国法院在承认和执行外国仲裁裁决的实践上,做了大量的工作,其中有教训,有成果,有为外人诟病之处,但更多的应该是通过实践积累起来的经验。本文系统考察和评述了1987年至2007年这二十年来中国法院承认与执行外国仲裁裁决上的司法实践,通过评述各种主要的抗辩理由,包括仲裁协议抗辩、正当程序抗辩、越裁抗辩、可仲裁性抗辩和公共政策抗辩等,具体引用中国法院的相关案例,来说明中国法院对于《纽约公约》相关规定的理解和应用,并希望将来这方面的司法实践能够日益完善。 The recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards is one of the most important issues in international commercial arbitration. Since the entry into force of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (“New York Convention”) in 1987 in China, Chinese courts have done a great deal of work in the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards, including lessons learned, There are criticisms of outsiders, but more should be accumulated through the experience of practice. This article systematically reviews and comments on the judicial practice of Chinese courts in recognizing and enforcing foreign arbitral awards over the past two decades from 1987 to 2007, and reviews various major defense reasons, including defense of arbitration agreement, defense of due process, Arbitration defense and public policy defense. The article specifically refers to relevant cases of Chinese courts to illustrate the Chinese courts’ understanding and application of the relevant provisions of the New York Convention and hopes that judicial practice in this area will be improved day by day.