海源阁藏书的几个问题

来源 :山东图书馆季刊 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:mikoo999
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
读到《文史知识》1989年第2期上范景华同志《著名私人藏书楼——海源阁》一文,发现有不少问题。兹提出意见如下: (1) 范文提到“《楹书隅录》记载:凡宋本八十五,金元本八十九,明本十三,校本百有七,抄本二十四,实为二百六十九种。”这个数目不确切。首先,这个数目是包括《楹书隅录续编》著录之书在内,不光是《楹书隅录》著录之书,混称《楹书隅录》是不对的。其次,《隅录》和《续编》著录之书,根据《隅录》和《续编》卷 Read the “literary history” in 1989 on the second issue of Comrade Fan Jinghua “famous private library - Haiyuan Pavilion,” a text and found that there are many problems. I hereby give my opinion as follows: (1) Pham Van mentions “records in the book” records: Where the Song Dynasty eighty-five, the Jinyuan eighty-nine, the Ming Dynasty thirteen, the school 100, the copy twenty-four, Two hundred and sixty-nine. “This number is not clear. First of all, this number is not only a book written in the Book of Calligraphy, but also a memoir of ”Book of Songs“, including the book of the book ”Continued Editing of Bookmarks.“ Second, the book ”recorded“ and ”sequel,“ the book, according to ”recorded“ and ”sequel" volume
其他文献