文史互证与释古鉴今——评《陈东有文史论稿》与《陈东有〈金瓶梅〉论稿》

来源 :江西社会科学 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:visualhoxygen
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
《陈东有文史论稿》《陈东有〈金瓶梅〉论稿》两册文集,充分反映出作者学术发展的轨迹与特点:由“河”入“海”的学术轨迹,即学术兴趣与领域从更多倾向于文学艺术本体理论研究到跨入社会、经济、文化学的研究,从运河文化史的研究到海洋社会经济史的研究;文史互证的学术方法,即文史互证,虚实结合,人文阐释与社会科学方法并重,注重明清社会经济变迁与文学发展的关联性研究;释古鉴今的学术追求,即明清社会、经济、文化等多个领域的学术探究体现出作者浓郁的现实关怀。 “Chen Dong’s Manuscript of Literary History” “Chen Dong-you Manuscripts,” two volumes of anthologies, fully reflects the author’s academic development track and characteristics: from “river” into “sea” academic track, that is Academic Interests and Fields From more tendencies in the study of literary and art noumenal theories to studies in social, economic and cultural studies, from the study of the canal’s cultural history to the study of marine social and economic history, the academic method of mutual exchange of literature and history, that is, The combination of evidence and reality, humanistic interpretation and social science methods pay attention to the study of the relevancy between social and economic changes in the Ming and Qing dynasties and the development of literature. The academic pursuit of ancient times is the academic exploration of the social, economic and cultural fields in Ming and Qing dynasties Reflects the author’s rich practical concern.
其他文献