由于文献典籍仍然是历史研究中史料的基本来源(尽管历史文物有其确凿可信的不可取代特性),因此,如何把握和认识、理解历史文献,才会成为史学方法论讨论中一再触及和难以回避的问题。 理解和解释文献史料,首先要确立解释的理论依据。中国传统史学经学注释中“我注六经”与“六经注我”之争,以及哲学上言不尽意、意在言外的“言意之辨”,都与 Because literature and documents are still the basic source of historical materials in historical studies (though historical relics have their credible and irreplaceable characteristics), how to grasp and understand and understand historical documents will be repeatedly touted and unavoidable in the discussion of historical methodology The problem. To understand and explain the historical documents, we must first establish the theoretical basis for interpretation. The controversy between “My Notes to the Six Chapters” and “The Six Chapters Notes to me” in the Annotation of Confucian Classics in the Chinese traditional history as well as “The Differentiation of Words and Meaning”