论文部分内容阅读
利用ESDA方法和空间计量模型对中国329个地市经济增长空间俱乐部趋同假说进行检验,并与省份数据进行比较,最后探讨其形成机制。结果表明:地市ESDA分析得到的区域组更加符合俱乐部趋同“组内趋同而组间趋异”的特点;地市经济增长存在两个空间趋同俱乐部,其形成机制是,在经济行为的空间异质性和增长的局域空间溢出效应的共同作用下,产生不均衡空间分布,形成HH与LL两个区域组。在它们内部各地市之间的相互作用程度比区域组之间高,因而诱发了HH组、LL组内出现增长集聚。伴随着增长的持续,HH组、LL组的集聚程度不断提高,两组之间的经济增长差异不断扩大,于是形成两个空间趋同俱乐部。
Using ESDA method and spatial econometric model to test the convergence hypothesis of spatial clubs of economic growth in 329 cities in China, and compared with the provincial data, and finally discuss the formation mechanism. The results show that the regional groups obtained by ESDA are more in line with the characteristics of club convergence, “convergence within groups and divergence among groups”. There are two spatial convergence clubs in the economic growth of cities and cities. The formation mechanism is that in the economic behavior Under the combined effect of spatial heterogeneity and increased local spillover effects, an unbalanced spatial distribution is created, forming two regional groups HH and LL. There was a higher degree of interaction among markets within each of them than between regional groups, thus inducing an increase in concentration within the HH group and the LL group. With the continuous growth, the concentration of HH group and LL group increased continuously, and the difference of economic growth between the two groups continued to expand, thus forming two space convergence clubs.