××: 你说,要读懂一篇课文,应当先了解词和句的意思。这话很对。你又说,词句尚未看通,却说这篇课文已经懂得了,这不是真懂,是假懂。这话也很对。你信上特别提到这两句话,也许是有感而发的吧。按理说,这个道理很平常,古话说,“积字成句,积句成文”,文章由字(词)句积累而成,离开字(词)句,文章也就失去依凭。凡是好文章,遣词造句都一定经过锤炼,历史上有过不少推敲词句的佳放。可是说也奇怪,我们的语文教学,近年来就发生过这样的怪事:教一篇课文,认为教学任务就是进行思想教育,词和旬的训练却是虚应故事,但求了解课文大意就行,略知大意以后,就把主要力量放在“加强政治思想性”上,离开语言文字,空谈主题形象。影响所及,学生读完课文,能背 ××: You said, to read a text, you should first understand the meaning of words and sentences. This is true. You say, words have not seen, but said this text has been understood, this is not really understand, is to understand. This is also true. You may have mentioned these two sentences in your letter. It stands to reason that this is a very common truth, the old saying goes, “the product into a sentence, the sentence is written,” the article by word (word) accumulation of words, leave the word (words) sentence, the article will lose. All good articles, words and sentences must be tempered, in history, there have been many scrutiny of the good put. However, it is strange to say that our language teaching has occurred in recent years such a strange thing: to teach a text that the teaching task is to carry out ideological education, words and ten days of training is a virtual story, but to understand the text on the line, After the effect, we put the main force on “strengthening political ideological”, leave the language, talk about the theme image. Affected, students read the text, can back