论文部分内容阅读
行政行为形式论是传统行政法的核心,通过行政行为法律形式的“类型化”锻造、内在要素的“制度化”建构、司法审查的“规范化”对接,为行政合法性提供了衡量标尺。伴随着新行政法中“合法性”“合理性”双重目标的二维互动,行政行为形式论面临着三重现实困境:新兴行政行为难以类型化处理、实体政策面向之关注先天不足、行政过程和法律关系缺乏回应。行政行为形式论应在“合法性”“合理性”两个维度上进行双面拓展,一方面要继续维持传统行政行为形式论的核心地位,另一方面引入政府规制论、行政过程论、法律关系论等理论提升工具,探索行政活动方式选择与组合的法理。
The formalism of the administrative act is the core of the traditional administrative law. Through the legal form of the administrative act, the “type” forging, the “institutionalization” of the intrinsic elements, the “standardization” of the judicial review and the administrative legitimacy Provided a gauge. With the two-dimensional interaction of the dual goals of “legitimacy ” “rationality ” in the new administrative law, the formal theory of administrative behavior is confronted with the triple reality predicament: the emerging administrative behavior is difficult to be typed, the substantive policy orientation is not enough, Lack of response to administrative processes and legal relations. On the one hand, we should continue to maintain the core status of the traditional form of administrative behavior, on the other hand, we should introduce the theory of government regulation and administration Process theory, legal relationship theory and other theories to enhance the tools to explore the choice of administrative activities and the combination of jurisprudence.