正常的舆论监督不应该仅仅是对聚光灯下的企业穷追猛打,这种从众的舆论监督模式往往有失公允。今年6月,央视财经频道总监郭振玺涉嫌受贿被检察机关立案侦查的消息被最高检通报,一时掀起轩然大波。那些震慑于央视的监督之下而胆战心惊的企业暂时缓了一口气,包括任志强、史玉柱等知名企业家因央视的这份“关照”而气愤的往事也被一一扒了出来。某种程度上可以说,拥有几十年历史的央视和被郭振玺错误地操纵而过度“监督”的企业,在这场非典型的舆论战中都是输家。而透过这种因利而生的监督与被监督, The normal supervision of public opinion should not be a mere pursuit of the enterprises under the spotlight. Such public supervision of public opinion is often unfair. In June this year, CCTV financial channel director Guo Zhenxi suspected of accepting bribes was prosecuted for the investigation of the highest detection report, temporarily set off an uproar. Those who are scared to fear under the supervision of CCTV and the enterprises with trepidation temporarily sigh of relief, including Ren Zhiqiang, Shi Yuzhu and other well-known entrepreneurs because of CCTV’s “care” and the anger of the past was also one by one Pa Pa out. To some extent, it can be said that CCTV, which has a history of several decades, and the enterprise that was mistakenly manipulated by Guo Zhenxi and overstated it, all are losers in this atypical media war. Through such supervision and supervision arising from profit-making,