论文部分内容阅读
目的:考察情绪问卷中文版的信度和效度。方法:采用分层抽样法,从4所中学选取2592名中学生,进行情绪问卷的信度和效度分析。随机抽取30名中学生间隔4周重测,评定重测信度。结果:情绪问卷中文版的Cronbachα系数为0.93,分半相关系数为0.90,重测信度为0.84。情绪问卷中文版各因子及总分与儿童抑郁障碍自评量表总分的相关系数分别为0.95、0.91、0.88、0.86、0.36、0.84;与儿童焦虑性情绪障碍筛查表总分的相关系数为0.79。主成分分析共提取5个因子,解释变异量的48.8%。验证性因素分析的拟合指标χ2/df、RMSEA、GFI、AGFI、NNFI、CFI分别为:4.59、0.05、0.91、0.89、0.97、0.97。结论:情绪问卷的信度、效度均较理想,符合心理计量学要求,可以满足今后国内有关研究和临床应用的需要。
Objective: To investigate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the emotional questionnaire. Methods: By stratified sampling, 2592 middle school students were selected from 4 middle schools to analyze the reliability and validity of emotional questionnaire. A total of 30 middle school students were randomly selected for retesting at intervals of 4 weeks to assess the retest reliability. Results: The Chinese version of the emotion questionnaire had a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.93, a half-correlation coefficient of 0.90, and a test-retest reliability of 0.84. The correlation coefficients of the Chinese version of the emotion questionnaire and the total score of the children’s depressive disorder self-rating scale were 0.95, 0.91, 0.88, 0.86, 0.36, 0.84 respectively; and the correlation coefficient Is 0.79. Principal component analysis extracted a total of five factors, explaining the variance of 48.8%. The fitting indexes χ2 / df, RMSEA, GFI, AGFI, NNFI and CFI of confirmatory factor analysis were respectively 4.59,0.05,0.91,0.89,0.97,0.97. Conclusion: The reliability and validity of the emotion questionnaire are all in line with the requirements of psychometrics and can meet the needs of future domestic research and clinical applications.