本文選取雍正七年記事爲考察對象,比較了王録、實録、《大義覺迷録》與起居註册等的文本。通過對曾靜案的記述分析,可以肯定,《大義覺迷録》是王録的史源,排除了來自實録稿本的説法;而七年其他記事表明,實録是王録的唯一史源。王録利用《大義覺迷録》、實録,自有一套編纂方法。該方法有得有失。 This paper chooses the seven years of Yongzheng as the object of investigation, and compares the texts of Wang Lu, Record, “Lutheran” and Registration of Daily Living. Through the analysis of the narrative of Jing, it can be affirmed that “Lutheran” is the source of Wang Lu and ruled out the account of the verdict; while the other notes of seven years show that the record is the only one recorded by Wang Lu source. Wang Lu use of “righteousness fans”, recorded, own set of compilation methods. The method has gained or losing.