作者把文章建立在文字学的基础上,那么就要求作者本身应该具备非常好的文字学知识。怎么样运用对文字学知识的感悟、体会来生发?怎么样用来证明你的观点?这是这篇文章应该注意的。从此文看来,作者由于条件所限,在引用材料上几乎全是三十年以前的研究成果,最近也是十多年前的,对近几年来的研究基本上没有予与关注。这很明显和确立的课题有些矛盾,对现有的文字学状况和研究成果没有全面展望、铺开。对当代使用文字学研究书法 The author based on the text based on the article, then asked the author itself should have a very good knowledge of philology. How to use the knowledge of literary understanding, experience to hair? How to prove your point of view? This is the article should be noted. From the point of view of this article, due to the limited conditions, the author has almost all the research results of the reference materials thirty years ago, and more recently ten years ago. The research in recent years has basically failed to pay any attention to it. This is obviously contradictory to the established issues and there is no overall prospect for the existing literary status and research results. Calligraphic research on contemporary use of philology