论文部分内容阅读
包括《中国社会科学》、《中国人民大学学报》、《河北学刊》、《中国社会科学院院报)和《新华文摘>、《中国社会科学文 摘》、《高等学校文科学术文摘》在内的一系列重要报刊,在过去的两三年里,曾经对中国哲学的“合法性危机”和“超越之路”进行 过卓有成效的研讨。这些努力,为人们在清理西方叙事的基础上如何重建中国哲学的现代性话语作出了积极的贡献。但是,从 2004年的几个具有影响性的事件看,这一切并未尘埃落定。
Including “Chinese Social Science”, “Journal of Renmin University of China”, “Hebei Academic Journal”, “Chinese Academy of Social Sciences” and “Xinhua Digest”, “Chinese Social Science Digest”, “Academic Liberal Arts Abbreviations” A series of important newspapers and periodicals have conducted fruitful discussions on the “crisis of legitimacy” and the “transcendence” of Chinese philosophy in the past two or three years. These efforts have made a positive contribution to how people can reconstruct the modern discourse of Chinese philosophy on the basis of cleaning up Western narratives. However, judging from several influential events in 2004, all this has not been settled.