论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨小儿重症肺炎监护病房实施人性化护理干预的临床观察。方法选取2015年5月—2016年5月治疗的小儿重症肺炎患者52例,随机分为对照组和观察组各26例,对照组采用常规护理模式,观察组在常规护理的基础上采用人性化护理干预,比较两组护理效果及不良发应发生情况,计量资料以x—±s表示,组间比较采用t检验,计数资料采用χ~2检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果观察组抢救成功率为96.15%(25/26),对照组为65.38%(17/26),两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ~2=7.924,P<0.05);观察组护理满意度为分(98.5±1.9),对照组为(91.2±1.3)两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=16.169,P<0.05);观察组不良发应发生率为11.54%低于对照组的50.00%,比较差异有统计学意义(χ~2=9.028,P<0.05)。结论采用人性化护理干预小儿重症肺炎,效果显著,可以有效降低不良反应发生率,值得临床应用。
Objective To investigate the clinical observation of humanized nursing intervention in pediatric severe pneumonia intensive care unit. Methods Fifty-two children with severe pneumonia treated in May 2015-May 2016 were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 26 cases in each group. The control group received routine nursing mode. The observation group was treated with human Nursing interventions were conducted to compare the nursing effects and incidence of adverse reactions in the two groups. The measurement data were expressed as x- ± s. The t-test was used to compare the data between groups. Chi-square test was used to count data. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The success rate of rescue in the observation group was 96.15% (25/26) and in the control group was 65.38% (17/26), the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ ~ 2 = 7.924, P <0.05) (98.5 ± 1.9) in control group and (91.2 ± 1.3) in control group, there was significant difference between the two groups (t = 16.169, P <0.05). The incidence of bad hair in the observation group was 11.54%, which was lower than that in the control group 50.00%, the difference was statistically significant (χ ~ 2 = 9.028, P <0.05). Conclusion The intervention of human nursing intervention in children with severe pneumonia, the effect is significant, can effectively reduce the incidence of adverse reactions, it is worth clinical application.