基于语料库的评价语言局部语法研究近年来已成为语料库语言学的重要研究课题。然而,相关研究尚未从局部语法视角考察同一学科不同文化(母语)背景学者群体间的评价语言异同。本文基于Beijing CARE学术文本可比语料库中的西方和中国学者法律子库,对比分析了两组学者在使用n v-link ADJ to-inf.、it v-link ADJ to-inf.及it v-link ADJ that这3个评价型式时所呈现的高频局部语法型式。结果显示,两组学者共享3个评价型式及由它们产生的高频局部语法型式,但局部语法型式的构成特征及使用频数差异明显:两组学者评价语言中涉及的功能范畴、语义参量,乃至共选关系有重要区别,形成各自特征性的局部语法型式;中国学者3个评价型式及大多数局部语法型式的使用频数显著低于西方学者。 Corpus-based evaluation of language The study of local grammar has become an important research topic in corpus linguistics in recent years. However, relevant researches have not examined the similarities and differences of evaluation languages ​​among different groups of scholars with different cultures (native speakers) in the same subject from the perspective of local grammar. Based on the legal sub-library of Western and Chinese scholars in the comparable corpus of Beijing CARE academic texts, this paper compares and contrasts the use of n v-link ADJ to-inf., It v-link ADJ to-inf. And it v-link ADJ that these three evaluation of the type presented by the high-frequency local grammar type. The results show that the two groups of scholars share three evaluation patterns and the high-frequency local grammar patterns generated by them. However, the compositional characteristics and frequency of use of local grammar patterns show significant differences: the two groups of scholars evaluate functional categories, semantic parameters involved in the language, and even There are important differences between the co-selection relations, forming their own characteristic local grammar patterns; Chinese scholars three evaluation patterns and most of the local grammar patterns were significantly lower frequency of use than Western scholars.