论文部分内容阅读
江苏一原告起诉被告非法阻碍其建房案,偷偷拍下了被告等人再度阻拦其建房的现场,利用偷拍的录像资料向人民法院起诉…… 2002年中央电视台《今日说法》报道了一起在民事诉讼中当事人一方以偷拍偷录的资料作为证据并被审判机关采纳的案例。其中一起为,江苏一原告起诉被告非法阻碍其建房案,几次起诉均因被告不承认有阻碍行为,原告方又找不到证人和证据,因而无法维护其合法利益。后来原告利用摄像机安装在隐蔽地方,偷偷拍下了被告等人再度阻拦其建房的现场,利用偷拍的录像资料向人民法院起诉,最终审判机关采纳了原告提供的视听资料作为证据,维
A plaintiff in Jiangsu sued the defendant illegally obstructing the construction of his house and secretly photographed the defendants and others blocking the site of their building again and using the video files photographed to the people’s court for prosecution ...... In 2002, CCTV’s “Today’s Comment” In the civil lawsuit, the party on the one hand took the data stolen and photographed as the evidence and was accepted by the judicial organ. In one case, a plaintiff in Jiangsu sued the defendants illegally for hindering the construction of their houses. In several prosecutions, the defendants did not recognize the obstruction and the plaintiffs could not find any witnesses or evidence and could not defend their legitimate interests. Later, the plaintiff used the video camera to install in a hidden place and secretly photographed the defendants and other people once again blocking the scene of their building. They used the candid video materials to sue the people’s courts. Finally, the judiciary adopted the audio-visual materials provided by the plaintiff as evidence.