论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较不同雾化吸入方式在哮喘急性发作期患儿中的应用效果。方法:将60例哮喘急性发作期患儿随机分为对照组和治疗组各30例。两组皆在常规治疗基础上给予雾化吸入布地奈德及沙丁胺醇;治疗组哮鸣音消失后给予雾化吸入沐舒坦,并进行胸部物理治疗。比较两组治疗效果。结果:治疗组咳嗽及肺部罗音消失时间早于对照组(P<0.01),住院天数少于对照组(P<0.01),临床疗效优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:在儿童哮喘急性发作不同时期雾化吸入沐舒坦并结合胸部物理治疗能明显缓解患儿症状,提高疗效,缩短病程,值得临床推广应用。
Objective: To compare the effect of different inhalation methods in children with acute exacerbation of asthma. Methods: Sixty children with acute exacerbation of asthma were randomly divided into control group and treatment group, 30 cases each. Both groups were given inhalation of budesonide and salbutamol on the basis of routine treatment. After the wheeze of the treatment group disappeared, they were given inhalation of mucosolvan by atomization and physical therapy of chest. Compare the treatment effect of two groups. Results: The cough and the disappearance of pulmonary rales were earlier in the treatment group than in the control group (P <0.01). The days of hospitalization were shorter than those in the control group (P <0.01). The clinical efficacy was better than that in the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion: The inhalation of mucosolvan and the physical therapy of thorax in different stages of childhood acute asthma can obviously relieve the symptoms of children, improve the curative effect and shorten the course of disease, which is worthy of clinical application.