论文部分内容阅读
现行《法理学》知识体系一般以法律要素框架来安置法律概念,这一处理方式尚缺乏完备性。需要区别法律概念与法学概念,二者在指称对象、作用方式、思维层次和存在场域等方面均有不同。法律概念指称现实世界中的事物,法学概念则指称法律概念世界;法律概念规范着人们的权利义务,法学概念则调整着法律世界中各种概念间的关系;法律科学的思维直接面对现实世界,法学概念则更具抽象性,它主要指向法律世界;法律概念存在于实在法所代表的法律世界中,法学概念则存在于理论化的法律科学中。各种不同的法学流派在建构自己的研究对象上有着根本差异,这两类概念之间存在着或相对应或不相对应的情况。区分这两类概念在法学教育和研究方面有重要意义。
The current “jurisprudence” knowledge system generally adopts the legal element framework to settle the concept of law. This method of handling is still lack of completeness. There is a need to distinguish the notion of law from that of jurisprudence, both of which differ in the subject of reference, mode of action, level of thinking, and field of existence. Legal concepts refer to things in the real world; jurisprudence concepts refer to legal concepts; legal concepts regulate people’s rights and obligations; legal concepts adjust the relationship between concepts in the legal world; , The concept of jurisprudence is more abstract, it mainly points to the legal world; the concept of law exists in the legal world represented by the law of reality, and the concept of jurisprudence exists in the theoretical science of law. There are fundamental differences among different jurisprudence schools in constructing their own research objects. There is a corresponding or non-corresponding relationship between these two kinds of concepts. It is important to distinguish between these two concepts in legal education and research.