论文部分内容阅读
尽管维特根斯坦“生活形式”概念的通行解释在细节上各有不同,但研究者普遍认为,必须把它解释为镶嵌在某一社会中使用的多面相语言游戏的各种文化体系。但这个解释真的符合维特根斯坦本人的观点吗?为此,本文将考察维特根斯坦手稿中对“语言游戏在人类生活中的嵌入”的论述。从那些论述中我们很可能发现,“生活形式”对应着“多种不同的生活形式”。事实上,“生活形式”概念的意义可能完全不同于“镶嵌着语言游戏的文化体系”。
Although the general interpretation of Wittgenstein’s concept of “lifestyles” varies in detail, researchers generally agree that it must be interpreted as a system of cultures embedded in multifaceted language games used in a particular society. But does this interpretation really fit Wittgenstein’s own opinion? For this reason, this article examines Wittgenstein’s treatise on the “embedding of language games in human life”. From those discourses we may well find that “life style ” corresponds to “many different forms of life ”. In fact, the meaning of the “life style” concept may be completely different from “a cultural system embedded in a language game.”