论文部分内容阅读
反讽主义者理查德·罗蒂认为,面对哲学与政治关系问题时,当代西方哲学家分为两个不可调和的类型。不想成为自由主义的反讽主义者,以福柯、德里达为典型;拒绝反讽主义的自由主义者,以哈贝马斯等人为代表。罗蒂引述茱迪·史柯拉(Judith Shklar)的自由主义者定义:相信残酷是我们行为当中最坏的事情的那些人。在诗性化的后形而上学文化中,罗蒂认为自由的反讽主义者或反讽的自由主义是知识分子的理想形象。罗蒂认为,反讽主义的自由主义需具备一些特别的能力:比如严肃认真面对自己思想与词汇的偶然性,非常重视再描述的力量,自由主义需要通过再描述变得更诗性化,而不是更理性化或科学化;自由主义文化应该是后形而上的文学文化。
The irony Richard Rorty believes that in the face of the relationship between philosophy and politics, contemporary Western philosophers are divided into two irreconcilable types. Do not want to become a liberalist irony, to Foucault, Derrida as a typical; refuse to ironic liberals, represented by Habermas and others. Rorty quotes Judith Shklar’s definition of liberals: those who believe cruelty is the worst thing in our conduct. In the poetical post-metaphysical culture, Rorty believes that free-ironic or ironic liberalism is an ideal image of intellectuals. Rorty argues that ironic liberalism needs some special abilities, such as the seriousness of seriousness of the accidental nature of thought and vocabulary, the importance of re-description, the need for more liberalization to be more poetic through re-description than More rational or scientific; liberal culture should be metaphysical literature and culture.