文章对三大诉讼的证明标准进行了比较分析。在此基础上对“证据占优势”证据标准加以理性剖析 ,认为其体现了“谁主张谁举证”的普通性举证责任原理 ,体现了达到“法律真实”的证明任务的要求 ,体现了民事诉讼中的民事意思自治原则和诉讼经济原则 ;从理论层面、制度背景、法律规定、公民诉讼观念的转变以及司法实践等五个方面对“证据占优势”证明标准在我国的可行性进行了探讨 The article makes a comparative analysis on the proof standards of the three major lawsuits. On the basis of this, we rationally analyze the evidence standard of “evidence predominance” and think it reflects the common principle of burden of proof that “who advocates who evidences” and embodies the requirements of the proof mission of “legal truth”, embodies the civil lawsuit In the theory of civil autonomy and litigation economy; from the theoretical level, the system background, legal provisions, the concept of citizen litigation and judicial practice of five aspects of the “evidence-based predominance” to prove the feasibility of the standard in our country