杨尚昆在一次谈话中说:「对于历史人物,我们要客观地评阶。比如,我们军队的两个元帅,一个是彭德怀,从庐山会议到「文化大革命」期间。把彭德怀说得一无是处,但历史上的彭德怀并不是这样的嘛。「七大」时,毛主席对百团大战并没有作结论,说这个问题放到抗日战争胜利后再说。后来斗争彭德怀时,就把百团大战作为彭德怀的一大罪状,说他违抗命令,不守纪律,不报告中央等等。这些都不符台历史事实。」「《彭德怀自述》是一本好书,但是不是每一件事彭德怀同志都记述得恰当呢?他那时手头一点材料都没有,完全凭自己记忆。他的记忆力是了不起的,但 Yang Shangkun said in a speech: “For historical figures, we must objectively evaluate the rankings, for example, two of our military commanders, one is Peng Dehuai, from the Lushan meeting to the” Cultural Revolution. “ Peng Dehuai nothing to say, but the history of Peng Dehuai is not the case. At the time of the ”Seventh National Congress“, Chairman Mao did not conclude the Hundred Regiments Campaign. He said that this issue should be put after the victory of the Anti-Japanese War. When Peng Teh-hui was struggled later, he took the Hundred Regiments as a great guilt in Peng Teh-huai and said that he defied orders, did not discipline, did not report to the Central Government, and so on. These are not consistent with historical facts. ”“ Peng Teh-huai’s self-report ”is a good book, but is not everything properly commented by Comrade Peng Dehuai? At that time, he did not have any information at hand and completely relied on his own memory. His memory is remarkable but