论文部分内容阅读
中西方古代法治思想有着本质的差异,但在形式上却有着许多共同或相似之处。作为中国传统法律文化集大成者的韩非和西方法律文化奠基人的西塞罗相比,两者在三个方面体现着共性与差异:二人都强调法律的作用,但存在着实用主义与道德主义的区别;都主张应遵循一定的自然法则,但道与自然法的本质却大不相同;都主张对公权力进行制约,但又有相对与绝对的区别。文章在分析这两种法律文化的异同的基础上,对中国法治传统的创造性转化作出了思考。
There are essential differences between the ancient Chinese ideas of the rule of law and the ancient ones, but there are many commonalities or similarities in form. Compared with Cicero, the founder of the western legal culture, Han Fei, who is the master of Chinese traditional legal culture, embodies commonness and difference in three aspects: both emphasize the role of law, but there is pragmatism and morals Both advocate that certain rules of nature should be followed, but the essence of Taoism and natural law are quite different. Both advocate the restriction of public power, but there are relative and absolute differences. Based on the analysis of the similarities and differences between the two legal cultures, the article makes some reflections on the creative transformation of the Chinese tradition of rule of law.