浅析涉外民事案件的识别问题——兼评《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第8条

来源 :仲裁研究 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:guo20
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
识别是国际私法中的重要制度,是司法机关或仲裁机关处理涉外民商事案件时确定冲突规则从而确定准据法的前提条件。由于各国法律在观念和制度上存在各种差异,识别冲突在所难免。传统观念认为,法官仅是本国法律的执行者,因此识别仅能依据本国法进行。这种观点未站在国际民商事自由交往的角度,实际上对内外国法没有进行平等对待,在个案中也可能无法实现实质的公平正义。在具体涉外民商事案件的审判中,当法官敏锐发觉识别冲突的存在时,应将识别纳入法律适用、个案裁判的全过程,从实现司法终极目标角度进行法律适用,即识别的过程也应体现实质正义的要求。 Identification is an important system in private international law and is a prerequisite for the determination of the law of conformity by judicial organs or arbitration agencies in determining conflict rules when handling foreign-related civil and commercial cases. Conflict identification is unavoidable due to the differences in concepts and systems among different countries. According to the traditional view, the judge is only the executor of the law of his own country, so the identification can only be conducted according to the national law. This view does not stand in the perspective of free exchanges between international civil and commercial affairs. In fact, there is no equal treatment of domestic and foreign laws, and substantive fairness and justice may not be realized in individual cases. In the specific trial of civil and commercial cases involving foreign affairs, when the judge is acutely aware of the existence of the conflict, the recognition should be incorporated into the whole process of the application of law and case adjudication, and the law should be applied from the perspective of ultimate goal of judicature. That is, the process of identification should also be reflected Real justice requirements.
其他文献
在张中生的把控下,烟雾腾腾的煤炭经济,造就了一个贪官、巨贾和骗子的江湖。  3月6日下午,全国人大代表、山西省委书记王儒林在山西团开放日说,山西119个县市区,去年财政收入最少的3300万。排在后9位都是贫困县。9个县财政收入6.07个亿,山西查处的一个副市长贪腐金额6.44亿,超过9个贫困县去年一年财政收入。  山西吕梁一位了解吕梁前副市长张中生案的人士透露,王儒林所言的贪腐6亿超9个县财政中的