论文部分内容阅读
本文在对现有的行政行为效力内容和研究方法进行总结、评述的基础上,运用行政过程论的研究方法对行政行为效力内容体系的重构进行了系统探讨。在回顾了行政行为论研究方法下的效力内容的各种学说后指出了传统研究方法的不足,认为在服务行政的模式下,固守概念分析的方法会导致思维的静止、呆板和僵化。重构行政行为效力内容设想建立在研究方法更新的基础之上。行政过程论要求坚持动态、整体、分阶段的观点。在其指导下,重构的行政行为效力内容主要包括先定力、公定力、不可变更力、不可争力、构成要件效力以及执行力,并且前二者属于程序效力,后四者属于实体效力。
On the basis of summarizing and commenting on the existing contents and research methods of the effectiveness of administrative actions, this paper systematically explores the reconstruction of the content system of administrative actions using the research methods of administrative process theory. After reviewing the various theories of the content of the validity of the research methods of the administrative behavior theory, this paper points out the shortcomings of the traditional research methods. In the mode of service administration, the method of keeping the concept analysis leads to the static, rigid and rigid thinking. The content of reconstructing the validity of administrative acts is based on the updating of research methods. Administrative process theory requires that we adhere to a dynamic, holistic and phased perspective. Under its guidance, the contents of the reconstructed administrative actions mainly include the first force, the unqualified force, the immutable force, the indisputable force, the constitutive elements and the executive force, and the former two are procedural ones. The latter four belong to the substantive force.