论文部分内容阅读
《美国侵华史》的撰著出版,以及曾彦修、刘大年围绕《美国侵华史》的一次未曾公开的学术论争,为我们认识新中国建立初期史学研究及学术争鸣提供了一个极佳视角。在意识形态语境下,学术与政治纠结是学术界的常态,学术论争往往偏离学术轨道而带有政治攻伐的意味。不可否认的是,这种杂揉政治因素的尖锐的学术批评,对于学术研究的推进仍有正面意义。
The publication of The History of the U.S. Invasion of China and an undisclosed academic debate surrounding the history of the U.S. invasion of China by Zeng Yanxiu and Liu Dainian provided an excellent perspective for our understanding of the historiography and academic debate in the early days of New China. Under the ideological context, academic and political tangles are the norm in academia. The academic controversy often deviates from the academic track and brings the meaning of political attack. Admittedly, this sharp academic criticism of the political factors is still of positive significance for advancing academic research.