导论对“违反制定法义务”进行界定并非易事。这一术语在诸多意义上被用以描述不同事物。在传统意义上讲,它描述的是一种为我们所熟知的侵权类型。在这种侵权类型中,刑法或公法上的制定法义务在侵权法上被认为是可诉的,以保护那些因违反上述义务而受损的人(为了本文论述的方便,这种侵权在下文中将被称为“传统”侵权)。这种侵权的典型例证当数行业安全立法和规定的可诉性。然而,“违反制定法义务”这个术语也在更宽松的意义上适用,用来描述任 Introduction It is not easy to define the “violation of statutory obligations”. This term is used in many ways to describe different things. Traditionally, it describes a type of infringement that is familiar to us. In this type of infringement criminal law or public law statutory statutory obligations are deemed as infitutory in the tort law to protect those who have been damaged by the breach of such obligations (for the purposes of this article, such infringement is hereinafter referred to as infringement Will be called “traditional” infringement). A typical example of this infringement is the availability of several industry safety legislation and regulations. However, the term “violation of statutory obligations” is also applied in a more relaxed sense to describe any