论文部分内容阅读
刑法实质解释是方法论,是刑法规范与原则认知、诠释、适用的的方式和技巧。刑法实质解释是独立的范畴和理论,它的意义脉络与发展沿革与刑法基本原则没有必然的关联。刑法实质解释的规范发现特性屡屡遭人诟病,这与形式解释论的理论局限性、解释主体错误解读刑法文本及实质解释论缺乏方法论建构等因素有关。辨析文本内涵,应该从规范目的与规范文义两个层面入手:刑法文本文义没有变化,且符合刑法目的;刑法文本文义扩张,且符合刑法目的;刑法文本文义收缩,且符合刑法目的。
The substantive interpretation of criminal law is a methodology, which is the way and skill of recognizing, interpreting and applying the norms and principles of criminal law. The substantive interpretation of criminal law is an independent category and theory. Its meaning, context and development are not necessarily related to the basic principles of criminal law. The normative discovery features of the substantive interpretation of criminal law are frequently criticized, which is related to the theoretical limitations of formal interpretation, the interpretation of the main mistaken interpretation of criminal law texts and the lack of methodology for substantive interpretation. To analyze the connotation of the text, we should start with the normative purpose and the normative literary meaning: the textual meaning of the criminal law text has not changed and meets the purpose of the criminal law; the textual meaning of the criminal law text expands and meets the purpose of the criminal law; .