目次一、政府违反《反垄断法》的行为解析二、责任担当三、责任救济机制政府在《反垄断法》中的角色担当主要有两种情形:一是政府直接或间接实施的垄断行为;二是政府作为反垄断执法实施主体,所采取的反垄断执法及其协调行为。无论学术界还是实务界在讨论《反垄断法》行为和责任时,往往把焦点瞄准经营者,而忽视了政府的行为、责任担当及其救济途径。在这些讨论者眼中,经营者并不包括直接或间接实施垄断行为的政府。政府直接或间 First, the government’s violation of the “Anti-Monopoly Law,” the behavior analysis Second, the responsibility to play Third, the responsibility relief mechanism The government in the “Anti-Monopoly Law” to assume the role of two main situations: First, the government directly or indirectly implemented monopoly; Second, the government as antitrust law enforcement implementation of the main body, the antitrust law enforcement and its coordination. Whether academics or practitioners discuss the “antitrust law” behaviors and responsibilities, they often focus on the operators and neglect the government’s actions, responsibilities and remedies. In the eyes of these discussants, the operators do not include the government that conducts monopolies directly or indirectly. Government directly or indirectly