论文部分内容阅读
《编辑学报》1992年第3期发表了《强化文稿发表的编辑控制机制——一件科学丑闻的教训》一文,我们读后颇受启示。我们以处理两篇稿件为例,从另一个侧面——维护著作权法来说明编辑控制机制的重要。1 情况 1992年12月份,《地球物理学报》编辑部先后收到两篇来自不同单位、不同作者的文章,内容都是讨论如何对刚体地球模型计算固体潮对时间的一阶微商。于是我们按编辑部审稿程序,将两文同送两位专家评审(其中一位
The Editorial Journal, No.3, 1992, published a paper titled “Enhancing Editing Control Mechanism of Manuscripts - Lessons from a Scientific Scandal,” Enlighting Enlightenment After Reading. Taking the handling of two manuscripts for example, we illustrate the importance of editorial control mechanisms on the other side - safeguarding the copyright law. 1 Situation In December 1992, the editorial department of the Geophysical Journal received two articles from different institutes and authors, each discussing how to calculate the first-order derivative of solid tide versus time for a rigid earth model. So we press the editorial review process, the two documents sent to two expert review (one of them